<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Retirement at risk: Who&#8217;s falling short</title>
	<link>http://www.revenuetip.com/retirement-at-risk-who-s-falling-short/</link>
	<description>Increasing Your Revenue -  Simplified</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 09:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: vtabletop</title>
		<link>http://www.revenuetip.com/retirement-at-risk-who-s-falling-short/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>vtabletop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.revenuetip.com/retirement-at-risk-who-s-falling-short/#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Well, the first question that comes to my mind is 'double or triple in how many years' ? and if it's a short duration ,is that really possible ? From what I know, the average number of years that it takes to double a substantial amount of money is 11 years .Yes, if it does exceptionally in the high risk investments then it could be brought down by a significant portion , but would a pensioner like to risk his money in such a scheme when he knows he can't replace that money if he loses it ? I daresay no. However, if tripling is a possibility while not taking any untoward risk at that age ,then there aren't many who would want to be left out either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the first question that comes to my mind is &#8216;double or triple in how many years&#8217; ? and if it&#8217;s a short duration ,is that really possible ? From what I know, the average number of years that it takes to double a substantial amount of money is 11 years .Yes, if it does exceptionally in the high risk investments then it could be brought down by a significant portion , but would a pensioner like to risk his money in such a scheme when he knows he can&#8217;t replace that money if he loses it ? I daresay no. However, if tripling is a possibility while not taking any untoward risk at that age ,then there aren&#8217;t many who would want to be left out either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: krimutinok blog</title>
		<link>http://www.revenuetip.com/retirement-at-risk-who-s-falling-short/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>krimutinok blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.revenuetip.com/retirement-at-risk-who-s-falling-short/#comment-99</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;krimutinok 80 post...&lt;/strong&gt;

all about krimutinok and top news...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>krimutinok 80 post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>all about krimutinok and top news&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


